DAVID BIANCULLI, HOST:
This is FRESH AIR. I’m David Bianculli, editor of the website TV Worth Watching, sitting in for Terry Gross. Elaine Pagels, a professor of religion at Princeton University, has made it her job to ask some big, tough questions, such as, why look to ancient texts, beliefs and practices in an age when scientists have made so many breakthroughs about the nature and origin of the universe? But after two family tragedies, her questions became deeply personal. In 1987, her life was shattered by the death of her son, Mark, at the age of 6 1/2, following a long illness. Then, just over a year after what she thought was the worst loss she could imagine, her husband, Heinz Pagels, a theoretical physicist and the executive director of the New York Academy of Sciences, died in a mountain climbing accident. Her long period of grieving led to her book, “Why Religion?: A Personal Story,” that combined memoir and biblical scholarship to reflect on how she found faith and lost it but kept searching. “Why Religion?” comes out in paperback next week. Elaine Pagels eventually found solace and meaning in ancient Jewish and Christian texts and in the meditation methods she was taught by Trappist monks. She’s best known for her writings on the Gnostic Gospels, the Christian texts that were omitted from the canon because they were considered heretical. Terry Gross spoke with her in 2018.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED NPR BROADCAST)
TERRY GROSS, HOST:
Elaine Pagels, welcome to FRESH AIR. You write, many of us have left religious institutions behind and prefer to identify as spiritual, not religious. You say, I’ve done both, had faith and lost it, joined groups and left them. To my own surprise, I went back, wanting to understand what happened and to explore the stories, poetry, music and art that make up religious traditions. You grew up in a secular family, and you write religion actually made your father angry. Why?
ELAINE PAGELS: Yes, it made him angry because he’d been raised by fiercely Presbyterian parents who apparently talked a great deal about hell and damnation, and he wanted to get out of that as soon as he could. So when he heard about Darwin, he just abandoned the whole ship and said, that’s for people who aren’t educated, not people like us. So he wanted to distance himself from that, became a scientist and said, this is the way to find truth.
GROSS: Did you grow up a skeptic about religion?
PAGELS: I didn’t grow up a skeptic. The family was culturally Protestant. So sometimes, my mother took us to a Methodist Church, which seemed to me well-meaning and, basically, fairly boring that particular church. And it didn’t have an enormous impact.
GROSS: Well, you were born again at the age of 15 after some friends convinced you – you were living in Palo Alto, and some friends convinced you to go to San Francisco with them to hear Billy Graham as part of his crusade for Christ. What year do you think that was?
PAGELS: That was marvelous. It was at the end of the ’50s, I think. I was a teenager. I didn’t know what I was getting into. I just thought it might be interesting. And I found it enormously powerful. And that was a big surprise. And, of course, as you say it, it really made my parents horrified when they heard that I had actually jumped right in.
GROSS: You joined the other side.
PAGELS: Well, born again – I mean, that was probably their worst nightmare – evangelical Christianity. What I realized is that there’s a great deal of power in that kind of conviction that Billy Graham expressed, that was articulated through the music. There were 18,000 people in Candlestick Park, which is a sports arena. It was an overpowering experience. And Billy Graham, to my surprise, was talking about the United States in a way that I had never heard. So that struck me deeply.
GROSS: What did he say that struck you like that?
PAGELS: Well, first of all, he said that what he preached was going to be – sound very strange to intellectuals and academics. And that’s the world I grew up in because my father was in that world. And it really did. He, first of all, denounced America for driving its most brilliant sons – of course, then, he only thought of men doing this – into the sciences to build bigger nuclear weapons. And this is only decades after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And to hear him talk about America, about nuclear weapons used against the Japanese, about slavery and segregation, I was totally hooked because I’d never heard anyone speak that way, and it sounded accurate.
GROSS: And were there spiritual things that he said that spoke to you, as well?
PAGELS: Yes. He also appealed completely to somebody who just turned 15. He said, now you can have a new life. You can be born again. You can break out of the confines of the world you live in – for me, that was suburban Palo Alto – and sort of break into a new universe, a much larger canvas, and find a new family. And I thought, wow. I – that was an irresistible invitation.
GROSS: So, you know, it’s interesting that death tested your faith pretty soon. You know, you were looking to art and music and poetry for a sense of larger meaning, too.
GROSS: And a good friend of yours named Paul was a painter, and he taught you about painting, and you were very close. And then he was killed in a car crash. He was a passenger…
GROSS: …In the car. And that tested your faith because of things that your fellow Christian friends said to you. What were some of those things?
PAGELS: I went back to my Evangelical friends. My friend Paul who was killed was 16 in high school. And when I went back to the evangelical church, my friends were very sympathetic, and they said, oh, that’s terrible. Was he born again? And I said, no, he was Jewish. And then they looked at me, stunned, and said, well, then he’s in hell. And I thought, what? That has nothing to do with what attracted me to this kind of community, this kind of conviction – God loves you, all of that. It has nothing to do with that. It’s antithetical. And I felt completely alone, walked out of there and never went back.
GROSS: So a little detour here because this is the part of your story that intersects with Jerry Garcia. And I thought, what? Elaine Pagels knew Jerry Garcia before he was in The Grateful Dead? That just kind of shocked me. So…
GROSS: …Was he in that car accident?
PAGELS: Yes. He had been in Palo Alto, playing music, hanging out at various places – Ken Kesey’s house up in Los Trancos Woods and in town. And he was older than the rest of us. But those of us in high school who knew that group were fascinated. He was a brilliant guitarist, and he taught us all kinds of music we never heard of. So I didn’t know him very closely, but he was very much a part of that group. When Paul my friend was killed in a car crash, it was coming from a party where Jerry and Alan Trist, who was his – later, his business manager, were in the car, as well as two other people. And Jerry was actually thrown out of the windshield. And Alan, I think, broke his back, or he had a terrible accident. And so we became, after that, rather close friends because we spent time together after the accident with a couple of other friends who had known each other before.
GROSS: You speculate in the book that The Grateful Dead was named in part because he survived this car crash and, you know, Paul did not. Do you have any evidence that that really was the source of the name of the band?
PAGELS: Yes. I did speculate that. It seemed obvious to me. And then later, I read something about it. I never – I didn’t see him after that, I mean, after he formed the group. That was years later. But I saw, in a biography about the group, that he said that accident woke him up and made him realize he didn’t have endless time. And he had to get serious. And so the name of the group, as I understand it, came from that accident.
GROSS: OK. Let’s take a break here. And then we’ll talk some more. If you’re just joining us, my guest is Elaine Pagels. Her new book is called “Why Religion?: A Personal Story.” We’ll be right back. This is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF MOACIR SANTOS’ “EXCERPT NO. 1”)
GROSS: This is FRESH AIR. And if you’re just joining us, my guest is religion scholar and professor at Princeton University Elaine Pagels. Her new book is called “Why Religion?: A Personal Story.”
So a question that you’ve always had – and this question kind of resounds throughout your book – is, why does religion continue to exist? With all we know about science now, why does religion exist? And what do we want from it? It’s not a question that you can answer in the course of an interview. But along those same lines, you know, you’re a historian of religion. So whether you practice a specific religion or not, you are immersed in the text of Judaism, Christianity. Your late husband, Heinz Pagels, was a theoretical physicist and studied chaos theory. Can you…
GROSS: …Talk about some of the similarities and differences between how you approached similar questions about the workings of the world and finding meaning in life? – him, from his point of view as a theoretical physicist studying chaos theory and you, from your point of view studying the great religious texts or at least…
GROSS: …Some of the great religious texts.
PAGELS: The question I started asking – after I’d left that church for years, I thought there’s something powerful there that – what was it? Was it about Christianity? Was it about religion? What was it? A part of it, Terry, was a kind of emotionally charged imaginative language that is spoken in these traditions – you know? – and was not really spoken in my home. It was also based on the assumption that science was somehow equivalent to religion.
Years later, when I met Heinz, he said to me, why religion? Why do you do something that has no impact in the real world? And I said, well, why do you do elementary particles? And we sort of laughed and argued and realized that we were both looking for some fundamental way of understanding our experience. And what I came to see, living with this wonderful scientist and wonderful man, is that he understood that physics does not answer metaphysical questions. And religions are a different kind of paradigm, an imaginative paradigm that talks about meaning in ways that scientists don’t and can’t. And so these are complementary. I came to understand that. And that’s one of the reasons that the religious traditions aren’t obsolete.
GROSS: I want to get back to your personal story. You and your husband had a baby after trying to conceive and then fertility treatment. So you gave birth to a son, but he was born with a serious heart problem that would require surgery after he reached the age of 1 and was strong enough to endure the surgery. The surgery seemed to go OK, but you later discovered that he had another fatal problem, pulmonary hypertension. You were told that that was fatal, that it would eventually, sooner or later, lead to an early death. Your son died when he was 6 1/2. So for 6 1/2 years, you loved your son knowing that he wouldn’t live long. And instead of planning for his future – when you looked into the future, you saw his death. And when he died, you felt guilty, even though it sounds like you did everything to give him the maximum amount of love and care. Why do you think you felt guilty?
PAGELS: That’s a good question because parents who are given a very difficult diagnosis about a child will do anything. And also physicians will do anything. They go to extreme lengths to deal with trying to treat a child with that kind of thing. And yet what I was reading at the time – I felt just in agony, of course, about this because it matters more to a parent than our own lives, you know, that our children survive. And yet there was nothing we could do. That sense of helplessness was almost intolerable. And I realized that I felt guilty about it. And yet at a certain critical point in my son’s treatment, I realized that the guilt was only masking something much deeper and much more painful than guilt. And what it was masking was the fact that we were helpless, that there was nothing we could do. We had no input. As long as I felt guilty, I felt, well, at least it’s my fault or I have some agency in something that matters more to me than my own life. But if I have no agency, I mean, that’s almost intolerable. And I realized that I’d rather feel guilty than helpless. It’s a choice I made unconsciously, and I think many people do because the feeling that we can’t do anything and we have no input is more than we can bear.
GROSS: After your son died, some people said to you, your faith must have sustained you. What was your reaction when people said that to you?
PAGELS: When people said that, I thought, I don’t know what you’re talking about. I’ve never felt further than anything they were calling faith then at a time of intense grief. That felt extremely remote to me. And I did wonder, you know, how can one go through this? How can one survive it? I wasn’t certain that I could at all.
GROSS: In the story of Jesus, you know, the story is that God sacrificed the life of his son. So put that in your words.
PAGELS: Well, I remember after our son died, I went to the Church of the Heavenly Rest in New York to talk to people there about the service that we would have. And I heard somebody preparing for Easter – it was right before Easter – talking about God so loved the world that he gave his only son to save the world from sin or something. And I just thought, any god who did that would have to be crazy. I mean, that doesn’t make sense. Our only son had just died. How could one do that for any reason?
Now, I understand why it’s said historically. I understand how it was put together that way. But it struck me as dissonant that this was somehow a sacrifice and something that would have been willed. What I found later in one of the secret texts from the discoveries in Upper Egypt with the Gospel of Thomas was a text called the Gospel of Truth. And that one has a very different perspective. It doesn’t see suffering as sort of ennobling, as teaching you something, as deepening your faith. I don’t like to say good things about suffering. I don’t like suffering. It’s very painful.
But this other text talks about suffering not as if it were some kind of wonderful state that can teach you a spiritual lesson. I think that kind of piety is very much overrated. Certainly it would have been for me. But rather, this spoke about the fact that when people suffer, there is a potential in that dreadful complex of experiences of grief to open up to other people in a deeper way, that it can demonstrate our connection with all other people. And for me, that’s – that feels accurate. And I’m grateful for that.
GROSS: On the first anniversary of your husband’s death, you went to Colorado, where he was killed in a mountain climbing accident and where you used to summer, and you meditated with the Trappist monks who you’d befriended there. And you say you used to have a tape loop in your mind of your husband falling from the cliff toward the rocks below. And that’s where the tape would stop and then start over again. So you had this constant image of him falling toward the rocks, but that’s as far as the image went.
GROSS: But when you were meditating with the Trappist monks, that image in your mind continued, and you actually saw in your mind your husband hitting the rocks. What do you think it was about meditating with the monks that furthered that image? And what was it like to live with that image as opposed to having it ending before the moment of impact?
PAGELS: That’s a good question. That tape loop began as soon as I heard of the accident. It seemed to go – it seemed to flip through my imagination every few seconds and then every five seconds and maybe 10 or 20. By a year later, it was less frequent, but it was often there. When I went into the chapel with Theophane (ph), whose name means God manifest – an extraordinary monk – and we meditated for about an hour, there was a great deal of sense of support in the silence of that communal meditation. And I felt that I dared – this was not a conscious choice – I’d felt that I allowed that image to go where it was going, to actually envision the whole accident.
It felt to me as though I actually saw it happen, although as I said later to a counselor that one of my friends referred me to – a grief counselor – she said, well, people don’t really think someone has died. They don’t really believe somebody has died until they can actually envision the whole event. And when someone dies, say, in an airplane accident, it’s very hard to do that.
So somehow, I think we need to be able to imagine and experience as much as possible of what happened because it’s a constant preoccupation for people in grief. And when that happened, it was shocking. It was also some kind of release because that’s what happened. I said to the grief counselor, well, everything about it seemed completely realistic except there was so much blood. That couldn’t have been realistic. And she looked at me and said, that’s what happens in this kind of accident.
GROSS: So once you had that kind of image completed with the moment of impact and the blood, did the tape loop stop?
PAGELS: That’s an interesting question, Terry. I hadn’t thought of it. It certainly was never as obsessive as it was before. I don’t go through that tape loop now.
GROSS: Elaine Pagels, a professor of religion at Princeton University, speaking to Terry Gross in 2018. Her book, “Why Religion?: A Personal Story,” comes out next week in paperback. After a break, we’ll continue their conversation. Also we remember Ram Dass, the American spiritual teacher who died last month at age 88. And our critic at large, John Powers, looks at the work of Italian filmmaker Federico Fellini, who was born 100 years ago this month. I’m David Bianculli, and this is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF ABDULLAH IBRAHIM’S “THE BALANCE”)
BIANCULLI: This is FRESH AIR. I’m David Bianculli, in for Terry Gross, back with more of Terry’s 2018 interview with Elaine Pagels. She’s a professor of religion at Princeton and author of the book “Why Religion?: A Personal Story,” which comes out in paperback next week. It’s about the death of her 6-year-old son, which was followed a year later by the death of her husband and about how she turned to the ancient texts she studies and to the meditation she learned from Trappist monks to help survive her grief. One of her previous books was a bestseller devoted to the Gnostic Gospels.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED NPR BROADCAST)
GROSS: You write, we blame ourselves when we’re suffering. Suffering feels like punishment, like we’re being punished for something. Did you go through that?
PAGELS: Oh, yes. I mean, I was reading anthropologists, too. That quote, that suffering feels like punishment, comes from an anthropologist and then another who wrote about the accidental death of his young wife when they were working together in the Philippines. She also fell from a cliff and was killed. He talks about guilt, and he says Western people raised in Jewish and Christian tradition in which say the story of Genesis says that we only die because Adam sinned. In other words, humans are guilty. If we weren’t guilty, we wouldn’t die. Now, that’s, I think, scientifically ridiculous. But psychologically (laughter), it’s rather powerful. And he said, there’s another response that this masks, which is also anger. And he talked about that. So the turmoil of feelings is very complicated, as anyone in that situation knows. And we had to struggle with it, try to untangle it, try to cope with it and then at – some way let it go.
GROSS: So you’ve spoken of meditation, of prayer. Where are you now in terms of your religious life?
PAGELS: I love my work because it allows me to explore the religious life of countless people in countless ages, in different traditions. I find that there are important elements of my experience that resonate with what I hear in Jewish and Christian and Buddhist tradition. I think of it as Marianne Moore says of poetry. She talks about poetry as imaginary gardens with real toads in them.
And I think, well, the gardens may be imaginary like the Garden of Eden, but there are human realities in the story that I connect with just the way that, you know, you and I would connect with the real truth, say, in a poem, in a writing of fiction, in music. And it touches us deeply even though the poem and the fiction may not be literally true. When you’re dealing with matters of this kind of experience, they can’t be articulated in some direct way. You know, as Emily Dickinson said, you tell the truth, but tell it slant, you know? You have to put it into metaphor or into silence or into some kind of image or story.
GROSS: So you find the stories powerful and meaningful, but you don’t believe in God, per se. Is that a good description?
PAGELS: I don’t – people ask about believing in God. You know, Terry, I think that belief is overrated. Talking about religions as if they were about belief takes an image that’s basically forged in Christian tradition and applies it to Judaism, applies it to Buddhism or Hinduism. And in other traditions, belief is not so much the center as practice – saying the prayers, saying the Shama or going to worship, participating with others in certain acts, prayer.
Those things I think are more meaningful to me than sets of beliefs. I react the way I do because Christianity in particular was formulated in the 4th century as a set of doctrines in the Nicene Creed, as you know. And, you know, that’s all very nice for the 4th century, but I don’t find that a compelling statement for me. So I don’t think it – for me it feels like so much a matter of what you believe but how you engage these traditions, how you live into them and share them with other people. But that’s why for me it is not simply one tradition that speaks to it.
GROSS: So when you describe your version of religion as a practice, are there things – are there rituals or ceremonies or prayers from whatever religion that is a part of your practice, or do you see, like, scholarship as being the practice – like, understanding and making connections as being the practice?
PAGELS: I do it all (laughter). I love scholarship and research. It’s a wonderful part of my life. I go to an Episcopal church often. I love the music. I – the person who’s the priest there is a man of spiritual depth, which I deeply appreciate. I go to yoga almost every day. That’s a physical and also contemplative practice – meditate sometimes. I walk in the woods, see my friends – I would say all of it. I don’t mean to mean that this is – it’s all part of a whole mosaic of different parts of one’s life. But I do have a sense that seeking for what I would call a spiritual dimension and engaging it is something that is very important to my life. That’s why I said – when people say, are you religious? I say yes, incorrigibly. That doesn’t mean that I, you know, go to church every day. It means that I’m enormously susceptible to what you spoke of before – the music, the rituals, the traditions, the prayers that I find there and also, too, those that we create. I wrote about also creating rituals, and many people do that. Many artists do that. And what many artists do is, feels to me, very closely akin to what I’m talking about.
GROSS: You end your book with a Jewish prayer. Blessed art thou, Lord God of the universe, that you have brought us alive to see this day. What does that mean to you?
PAGELS: As I wrote, it’s very surprising to me that long after these events happened, I feel alive and well. The children that I had to raise are alive and well, that people can recover from things that seemed impossible to recover from. I did see other people go into despair. And that, for me, seemed like a real possibility. I didn’t want to go there (laughter). I wanted to find an alternative to that, to find a way to live with hope and joy and courage. And that prayer speaks to coming out of that kind of isolation and fear. It speaks about gratitude for how we get through things.
GROSS: Well, Elaine Pagels, I want to thank you so much for talking with us and for reflecting so much about your life, your grief, the role of religion in your life as a scholar and just as a person. And thank you for writing your book.
PAGELS: Well, thank you. I really loved talking with you about it.
BIANCULLI: Elaine Pagels, a professor of religion at Princeton University, spoke to Terry Gross in 2018. Her book, “Why Religion?: A Personal Story,” comes out next week in paperback. Coming up, we remember Ram Dass, the American spiritual teacher who died last month at age 88. This is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE WEE TRIO’S “LOLA”)
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.